Exploring and developing our
promise of a permanent family for every child.
What Do You Think? ©
April
2003
|
Volume 4, Issue # 6
|
Topic:
What About
Belonging For Those Young People Who Are Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender,
Or Questioning?
Discussion:
As a permanent family connection for teens gathers itself into a movement
across the country, young people who are gay or “suspected” of being gay remain
sidelined. Repeatedly when we talk about
their unique needs, we talk about putting them into group homes with others who
face the similar life challenges of self acceptance and discrimination. We talk
about programs for them. Are we
ghettoizing or supporting and where’s the line?
Seldom do we talk about permanent families for them. And when we do, we
talk about maybe gay/lesbian families. But that brings up a whole other set of
issues. As “tolerant”, accepting or even
as loving as we may be, we find it hard to imagine a straight family making
room for a gay young person as part of their family. Is that real or a
reflection of our own feelings?
Our own homophobia runs deep. Not long ago a young man coming out of Rikers Island (NYC prison) told me about an incident where one of his cell block mates was caught having sex with another guy. As the guard berated him, the guy protested “I’m a murderer, not a fag!” How much do we all believe it’s better to be a murderer than “a fag”? And how is that reflected in the work we do with young people? How do we support others in accepting and welcoming them? As much as gay young people need the loving acceptance of others who face the same oppression, they also need the unconditional, irrevocable belonging of family. What keeps us from believing that it’s possible for gay young people to have permanent loving family membership may be in the roots of our own homophobia even in those of us who have “come out”.
We have come a long way in talking about race and
ethnicity; a young person’s need for family and cultural/ethnic/racial
roots. Not that we have it clear, but we
can talk about it. There is an analogy
here. We may be in that place of “better
for them to age out of care from an accepting program that can teach them how
to deal with living in an oppressive society” than risk the “uncertainty and
unpredictability” of a family, straight or gay.
Is the issue the fact that they have been vehemently rejected by their
birth families? And yet, here they are
in our care, sometimes in numbers as high as 25% of our kids. Who needs the
shelter of family more than a young person who has been living with the
assaultive rejection on a personal level, a family level and the societal
level? What will it take to make sure
ALL our young people are safe and secure?
What
Do You Think?